VAN GOGH AND RAILWAYS
We
have already seen that Van Gogh had, like Monet, included
a railway bridge as a subject in his painting Bridge at Asnieres
(left) in 1887 while living in Paris. He moved south to live in Arles
in 1888; within the city walls there remained the large Roman arena
and the ancient church of St.Trophime among picturesque narrow streets.
But there was a new Arles, a direct consequence of the coming of the
railway. The poet Lamartine, a hero of the 1848 revolution, was
determined that Arles should receive some share of the new industrial
progress going on elswhere. He had succeeded in getting not only a railhead
at Arles but also a locomotive centre for the south with rolling-stock
factories employing a thousand craftsmen.
Van
Gogh included these railways as important features in three paintings
out of the many he produced during his stay in Arles. These included
the distant view of a locomotive puffing steam, hauling a train over
a viaduct, to the right of his house in the famous The Yellow House
(Sept. 1888). In Le Train Bleu ou les Moyettes a locomotive hauling
a long train of goods wagons (right) is seen through the trees in a
park as it crosses the massive embankment that carries the rail track
into the centre of Arles. The two tiny black figures walking along the
road below the short bridge lend scale to the height of the embankment.
In
another painting, Les Moissonneurs, (left), the main subject
is a vast golden cornfield extending into the distance with, in the
foreground, cut corn and some stooks with two harvesters. Across the
top of the painting he reveals how the cornfield extends right up to
the industrial suburbs and the railway line. A long black train races
at high speed, indicated by the low plume of steam streaming back horizontally
from the stack of the locomotive. The red-roofed factories on the left
are the railway workshops with their tall smoking chimneys contrasting
with the old church towers on the right.
In
1890 Van Gogh returned to Auvers, a village to the northwest of Paris
close to the railway line which followed the valley of the river Oise.
Among the many wonderful paintings he produced in his short period there
was the Paysage avec Charrette et Train, June, 1890, (right).
This is a serene panoramic view across a wide vista of cultivated fields,
which extend across the plains surrounding Auvers. The scene, almost
entirely in a range of greens, is bisected horizontally by a sand-coloured
lane extending from white-walled red-roofed farm buildings on the extreme
left and right. On this empty lane, almost in the centre, is the small
black horse and cart, with the flash of its red wheels.
The 'lines' of growing vegetables, crops, and field boundaries converge
to a 'vanishing point' near the top centre, bringing the eye to the
'shock' of the intrusion into this pastoral scene of a long train of
passenger coaches horizontally spanning the whole picture. From the
stack of the locomotive on the right-hand edge extends the great plume
of white steam, stretching backwards as expanding spherical clouds,
portraying very accurately the 'puffing' discharge of bursts of steam.
The strong sense of the train's speed is in sharp contrast to the leisurely
pace of the isolated horse and cart.
The following Sunday, after completing this picture Van Gogh travelled
on this train to Paris. He had been worried about the financial situation
of his beloved brother Theo, but far from being reassured he returned
to Auvers more disturbed. Two weeks later in July he painted his last
two paintings, Crows over the Wheat Fields, and The Plains
of Auvers under a Stormy Sky, which are intense in colour and brushwork,
full of foreboding.
Many who have written about Van Gogh's life even consider that it was
while working on Crows over the Wheatfield that he shot himself. But
none of them have commented on the possible significance of his inclusion
in this preceding painting, only a few weeks earlier, of the train to
Paris. Did it symbolise to him his linkage to Theo, a lifeline in case
the insanity he was dreading was about to recur? With hindsight, did
he also, suffering loneliness in Arles so distant from Paris, include
the railway trains in his Arles paintings as symbolic links to Theo
on whom he depended so much for his frequent letters coming to him on
the mail trains and his life-line back to Paris?